WE Value Victims According To Their Killers!

So i was trying to find ways to explain this but cant find any other then this one!~

Couple days ago some dude with a gun shoots a bunch of people in, Vancouver or Toronto.

Killed a bunch wounded a bunch.

As such you would say that it is the same kind of thing wouldn't you?

I mean 1 man + 1 gun equaled a bunch of people wounded and/or dead.

I know it's not America but these where indeed people none the less, Humans and all!

But it's not the same is it?

Of course not he was black!

So now THIS act of senseless violence of 1 man who psychopathicalic slaughtered many and wounded many is nothing but gang violence!

This diminished value of the same act is due to 1 thing and 1 thing alone!

People beginning their statement by "Another :then the race: then the rest"!

The victims find themselves lessened!
Lessened by perceptual associativity!
And that is what pisses me off!

Not the way you vent, but the way you disregard the effect of insisting first and fore most on the murderers affiliations.

Which by definition defines the values of their victims.

Here nothing but gang relations!

No biggy!

If you can't perceive the reason why it is wrong, and i didn't say and/or mean insulting or that i find you racist for doing so, then we ain't out of the wood yet are we?

I don't feel victimized by your saying "Another white man killed countless"

After all it is fact not fiction!

But i do feel that as long as we insist first and fore most on stating and over stating these perceptual differences that we, in our ignorance and through our religious indoctrinations have decided to, defines as being the make up of multiple and different races of human beings, the value of the victims will remained defined by he nature of the killer, be he black or white or polka dot for that matter!

I wish you peacefull

But event filled lives!

Stephane Vincent